Album: Neil Young
Released: November, 1968
Several weeks back as I listened to the music of Buffalo Springfield
(see Forever Young # 8), I thought of ‘The Defenders’ and the difficulties that
can crop up when trying to keep a group together. For many reasons Buffalo Springfield was
destined to be short lived, and the biggest reason of all was Neil Young. In the comic series, the character who proved
the most difficult to rein in was the Hulk; a loose wire, far more antihero
than hero. Concocting ways of incorporating
the Hulk into a storyline was where the writers earned their keep. Buffalo Springfield on the other hand had no
such cohesive entity, and despite early success, the abundance of talent in the
band, and the potential for grander achievements, it was not long before the
loner in Neil Young took over, leaving the band several times before finally
calling it quits for good in 1968 after less than 2 years. If Buffalo Springfield had a Hulk, it was
Young.
Why was this? Why would Neil
Young leave a sure thing in the dust?
Reasons I’ve heard are legitimate enough given the career path which
would follow, including the need for full artistic control, and his chameleon
like qualities. But I think there’s
another deeper explanation that has not been explored, at least in the
literature I’ve read. Yet, it’s there
for anyone to interpret in Young’s very first solo single, The Loner ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H315jc_iHcI
), a song far more apropos than could have been obvious at the time of its
release. There are some very important
lyrics in The Loner that help explain
Neil Young’s need to go it alone. The
first is the refrain, which I first latched on to while enjoying this song back
in the 70s:
Know
when you see him,
Nothing
can free him.
Step
aside, open wide,
It’s
the loner
It had me digging deeper.
Early this week, as I thought more about The Loner and this refrain, another of Neil Young’s great songs
kept looping through my conscience: Helpless. At first I concluded the reason was fairly
superficial: To understand Young it
helps to understand his childhood, which this song is most certainly
about. Simple enough. But then I picked up on a common analogy in
the two songs; that of chains, keys and locks….and something clicked (no pun
intended).
In Helpless there are these lines:
The chains are locked
and tied across the door,
Baby, sing with me somehow.
and tied across the door,
Baby, sing with me somehow.
And in The Loner there are
these lines:
He's the unforeseen danger
the keeper of
the key to the locks.
the keeper of
the key to the locks.
I began thinking these analogies were linked (ok, pun intended this
time). In both cases the locked chains
appear to be referring to youthful innocence and the unlikelihood that you can
reconnect to these ideals once you lose them.
The thing about the hero in The
Loner is he’s figured out how to maintain that connection….but at a cost
(hence the title to the song). This
thought process actually brought me back to the Hulk, a simple minded brute who
could only relate to the pure-at-heart (and even then it was precarious). I always loved this angle in the Hulk storylines….
that being his zero tolerance for even an iota of superficiality (a similar trait
to several people I know).
Interestingly, listening to the studio version of this song there is an
audible second “of” in the line about locks: “He’s the unforeseen danger of
the keeper of the keys to the locks”.
That other “of” is not captured in any subsequent printing of the
lyrics, including the in-sleeve of the original album (the self-titled ‘Neil
Young’). Is this a Freudian slip? The additional ‘of’ changes the meaning
some: Instead of actually being the
keeper (of the key to the locks), he’s a threat to that keeper. I like this meaning better.
One other line in Helpless
reverberated with me this week as well: “All my changes were there”. In other words, nothing else was going to
mold Neil Young…. not Buffalo Springfield, not CSNY, not the Stray Gators, not even
Crazy Horse. He was already shaped in his
very young life. By the time he released
Helpless in 1970, he knew this. It’s not so much a bold declaration as it is
a submission to what he sees as fact.
Growing up, I connected with far more loners than insiders. I’m not sure why this is, as I was likely the
most extroverted of the crowd I hung out with (in a musical context, I enjoy
musicians who can survive in a band more than those who need to break away). Regardless, I feel blessed: These connections shaped me, and made me a
better person.
At the very least, they allowed me to relate to someone like Neil Young.
-
Pete
No comments:
Post a Comment