(33rd in a series of) Stepping Stones "Photographic Memory"

Song: Plundered My Soul

Album: The re-release of Exile on Main St (with bonus tracks)

Re-released:  April, 2010

Back when I was writing up the 100 Gem Music Video of the Week (GMVW) series over a two year period from 2008-09 (all entries preserved on this blog), a major focus of mine was the quality of the selected video.  As much as the songs themselves, the videos were a driving force; an inspiration.  Several times I actually skipped over a great song choice because I could not find a suitable video.  Many of the clips were from an official MTV-type release.  Others were of a live concert.  Every time it was a factor; and it remained a pledge of mine throughout to stay focused on that angle on a consistent basis.  This time around, with the Stepping Stones (and hopefully beyond), I realized early that to dig deeper into an individual band’s vault of songs, I could not keep the same pledge.  The songs have in turn become the sole driver, and the videos have been attached simply as a reference. 

That was until this week.  

This week I had several songs in mind, but nothing significant was stirring up in regards to what to write about any of them.  Then I started searching out video entries on YouTube for each and the eventual winner, Plundered My Soul, a bonus track on the 2010 re-release of ‘Exile on Main Street’ had a video made for it that was astounding; one of the best I’d ever seen. The video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6ZnmXrRUIQ )is a pictograph of the Rolling Stones in the ’72 period when they were at their creative best.  And not only does it show an amazing array of rare photos, it’s a virtual diorama, and done in an extremely insightful and thoughtful way. 

In watching it over and over, I knew there was something there that would inspire an idea, which finally came to me over the weekend, with the help of a convergence of sorts:  The arrival from France of old friend - and shutterbug extraordinaire - Bob.

---------------      ---------------      ---------------      ---------------      ---------------

They say a picture is worth a thousand words.  If this is the case, then Bob has compiled a voluminous masterpiece, preserving a life of memorable moments in a way that few have.  As the years have rolled on, Bob’s old photographs have become more and more invaluable to his many friends.  His collage is often the first thing we track down when we visit him, as it all brings back memories of incredible moments in our lives.  In hindsight, Bob’s fascination with capturing the moment has been a great service to us all.

For me, the preserved memories are many; a broad brush stroke of great times had:

·         There’s the classic album cover-like photo of Steve, Tom and I at the entry way to Central Park after a ‘homeless’ evening in the Big Apple (see GMVW # 36):  A three-tiered snapshot, with me having climbed to the top of the upper stone wall, sitting there, Tom standing on the mid-level wall, and Steve sitting at the bottom. 

·         There’s the photo of me at the top of a mountain in the Swiss Alps, my feet just above a set of clouds, making it look like I’m floating on air. 

·         There’s the snapshot of a crowd of us outside of the Gladstone home in Ottawa, all ready to head over to the Panda Bowl; Bec and Dave’s earliest memory together. 

·         There’s Bob’s brother, Dave, in a canoe, which is barely discernible due to the improbable amount of firewood he had piled up into it to help stoke a campfire in the Adirondacks. 

·         There’s the picturesque view of Flam, Norway’s fjord, capturing the memory of a day trek to the top, and the mountain goat with the look in his eyes telling me I was crazy for likely being the only human that had ever come across his cliffy mountain home.

·         There’s the set of photos from Nancy and my wedding; much better than anything the official photographer was able to pull off that day.

·         There’s the magnificent warm-weather December day on Cape Cod, part of a road trip for the ages.

·         There’s the ‘stairs shot’ at the Waterloo memorial, Bob’s old hometown in Belgium: Nancy, Mac, Dave, Ed, Bob and I: Another one of these album-cover like photos.

·         There’s the group shot earlier that same week at a café in Montmatre, Paris, on the day I would ask for Nancy’s hand in marriage.

·         There’s the Humarock pictures from the many-a classic times had there.

·         And on it goes….

---------------      ---------------      ---------------      ---------------      ---------------

How was Plundered My Soul, along with a handful of other songs on the 2010 re-release, left off the original album?  This number is up there with some of the Stones all-time best.  Oh yeah…. this was ‘Exile on Main St.’, produced during an extremely prolific period for the band: The collage of photos in the video bares this out.  ‘Exile’ was already a double album, but the re-release tells me that it could have easily been a triple.  Back in February of 2009, I wrote a Gem Video (GMVW # 60) about deep cuts and how they define a great album, perhaps even more so than the hits.  I also mentioned that you can go a step farther:  What was left off the album?  I used to think Bob Dylan and Pete Townshend had a corner on the market in this regard. 

Not anymore. 

The pictures tell the story. 

Thanks to Bob, I know the feeling. 

-          Pete

(32nd in a series of) Stepping Stones "Dispensing the Notion of Indispensability"

Song: I Go Wild

Album: Voodoo Lounge

Released:  July, 1994

By the mid-90s the Rolling Stones were not even in the least bit competing for air time on my various music players.  In fact, if the Beatles were left in the dust (which was pretty much where they were in those days for me) the Stones were in their dust.  I had moved on, now listening to a whole variety of other stuff, including a lot of R.E.M., some Joan Baez, Richard Thompson, Randy Newman, Leonard Cohen and Iris Dement, the Counting Crows, the Crash Test Dummies, plenty of Bob Dylan, and as always the Who and solo Pete Townshend.  There were other musicians competing as well, seeing as Charlotte was born in 1994.  In turn, the sounds coming out of our cd player got a bit gentler by including the likes of Raffi, John McCutcheon and traditional Bolivian music (though I can proudly state that Charlotte also got a good dose of Rock n’ Roll in her earliest years).  And so like Puff the Magic Dragon, the trailblazing bands of my high school and college years slipped into their cave; which is analogical speak for the back of my record bin.

The only thing that kept the Rolling Stones even remotely on my radar at that time was their live shows, which I attended whenever they made their way through town.  As stated before, the Stones rarely, if ever, tour without releasing a new album and with an itch to get back on the road the band hit the studio in early 1994 to produce ‘Voodoo Lounge’.  I purchased it right off and gave it a few weeks of intense listening, but after the tour hit the area, I back-shelved it into the same zone of the bin where their other albums were already collecting cobwebs.  I don’t believe ‘Voodoo Lounge’ saw the light of day more than once or twice until very recently. The re-listen, however, had me recalling what I liked about the album at the time of its release.  Heck, it won a Grammy that year for Best Rock Album.  It was a comeback of sorts, and the new producer, Don Was, had added a nice new touch to their sound.  In hindsight I just did not give it the time it deserved:  Again, too much competition in those days. 

The biggest reason for my ambivalence though was personnel related.  Just before ‘Voodoo Lounge’, Bill Wyman decided to quit the band after 30 years (siting an ever growing fear of flying and a downgrade in band creativity) and I became immediately jaded about the Rolling Stones without him.  For me, the karma was gone.  Membership stability, a Stones staple, was suddenly out the door, and this bothered me.  I know it bothered Keith Richards too.  But what could he do, end it all simply because his longtime bass man was leaving?  I pondered this some back then, and also recall thinking; what if it was Ronnie or Mick or Charlie or a combination of several that was packing it in on Keith instead of Bill?  Where was that tipping point at which the essential nature of the band could no longer exist? 

I had been challenged with this concept before on a number of occasions.  Now it was the idea of “what makes or breaks the meaning of ‘The Rolling Stones’ ” that I had to contemplate.  In other words, was anyone in this band indispensable?  For that matter, what is it that makes an individual in any group effort indispensable?

--------------------  --------------------  --------------------  --------------------  -------------------- 

I suppose I’ve always been a traditionalist when it comes to band lineups.  For example, years ago I refused to see “Pink Floyd” without Roger Waters.  At the time I shared Waters’ disdain for David Gilmour, Richard Wright and Nick Mason in their use of the band name without him.  Later, I’d also find myself blowing off ELO without Jeff Lynne and the Cars without Ric Ocasek.  How could these bands reunite without such immense key cogs involved?  To me it was like Crosby, Stills and Nash touring without one of the three of them, and keeping the band/brand name!  Sure I’d break my stance here and there, attending several Band concerts without Robbie Robertson and Richard Manuel, as well as the Allman Brothers without Duane Allman, the Grateful Dead without Jerry Garcia, and even a brief reunion of the Byrds without Gene Clark.  But in all these cases, the lost ingredient(s) was always in the back of my mind, leaving me to wonder during the shows what the given show would have been like if these founders, these true movers and shakers, were still there.

It took Zak Starkey to correct my jaded-view bias in 1996.   Up to that point, I’d seen the Who a handful of times without their legendary drummer, Keith Moon.  First there was Kenny Jones, and then Simon Phillips, each proficient in his own right, but neither matching the intensity or style of “Moon the Loon”.  I knew I was watching a tainted version of the band for years, and questioned their use of the name in the same way as I did all those others.  The difference with the Who, however (and maybe the Band) was that every original member was equally as incredible in their musical talent as the other.  Was this the boundary for me between someone being indispensable and another replaceable; the idea that if each and every individual brings an equal talent to the whole, they clear some type of hurdle when losing a part, allowing the band name to endure?  Was this the difference between the Who losing Keith Moon and the Rolling Stones losing Bill Wyman?

Back to Zak Starkey.  In 1996, Nancy and I headed to Madison Square Garden with Bec, Dave, Kurt, Mac and others to see the Who perform the entire ‘Quadrophenia’ (see GMVW # 22 for details).  This was the ultimate test for the tainted Who, as ‘Quadrophenia’ remains the standard-bearer instrument album for this band.  The drums are truly exceptional on the album, tapping into a prior unknown musical ability, along with the bass and vocals.  To me, the remaining lineup was now going way out on a limb to resurrect this sound down in the Big Apple.  There was no way they could meet our expectations without Keith Moon, was there?  At the same time, I was impressed that the Who were willing to give it a go, and so off we went to see for ourselves.

In a nutshell (since this is currently a Rolling Stone forum and not a Who forum) we were not disappointed.  On the contrary, I was blown away with the show, and the key to it all was Zak.  Ringo’s son had channeled his inner Keith Moon, something I thought impossible.  And he was not only able to do that, but was at the same time able to add his own touch as well.  The Who were incredibly the Who again.  I did not expect this.  This band would be thrown another curve ball in 2002 when John Entwistle died, but they were already able to do what I had never seen before:  Get away with losing what I determined to be an indispensable element.  The Who got me to reevaluating my belief system.  They got me thinking in a different way yet again, as they had done so many times in years gone by.   

And they got me thinking:  Is it possible for a band to carry on beyond all of its founding members?

--------------------  --------------------  --------------------  --------------------  -------------------- 

Darryl Jones was a suitable replacement for Bill Wyman; certainly not the same, but with Wyman and the Stones, this is much harder to feel out than the case I explained above with the Who.  The Stones are far more visceral; so much harder to pinpoint what makes them exceptional (I hope I’m doing some of the explaining this year, though).   Anyhow, the Rolling Stones got away with the transition to a degree.  They were able to endure, to release three more studio albums (to this date) and to launch out on a handful of mega tours.  The band was diminished in my mind, but still relevant, and justified in carrying their name and lips-logo forward.  For new fans, none of this seemed to matter all that much:  People from former Eastern Bloc countries were seeing the Stones come to their countries for the first time in the 90s and jumping on the band wagon.  The Stones were still the Stones in their mind (I experienced this myself just this weekend when I went to see Gandalf Murphy and the Slambovian Circus of Dreams at the Bull Run with Nancy and good friend, Jeff.  It was my first time going and what I was witnessing was a tight-knit band.  For Jeff, however, the loss of their longtime drummer was having an effect as the new percussionist was not quite up-to snuff).

Could there be such a thing as a never-ending band lineup?  Why not?  If a band plans correctly, it could overlap new members forever, much like what has been happening for decades now with the Allman Brothers Band.  The concept exists in other realms too.  The New York Yankees have endured as an iconic institution, with just enough overlap in their superstars to “pass the torch”:  Ruth to Gehrig to DiMaggio to Mantle, and so on.  On Saturday Night Live, it was John Belushi passing the torch to Bill Murray who passed it to Eddie Murphy and on to Mike Myers then Will Ferrell, Tina Fey and Kristen Wig.  This concept can happen in great bands, yes?  I’m surprised none of them have publically connected with this thought: The idea of an enduring legacy. 

--------------------  --------------------  --------------------  --------------------  -------------------- 

This weeks’ Stepping Stone I Go Wild ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wdVdS8CmsQ ), is one of the best songs on the ‘Voodoo Lounge’ album.  Listening to it over the past week, I was thinking that Mick Jagger sounds like he really enjoyed singing it, as he takes the song to that next level that all great musicians seem to be able to do on occasion.  Later I read he very much did enjoy singing it. 

Yes, Jagger and the remaining Stones all sound almost indispensable when you listen….but ever since I watched Zak Starkey fill in for Keith Moon, I’ve known better.

-          Pete

(31st in a series of) Stepping Stones "The Homeless Lady, the Padre, and the Desert Cowboy"

Song: Dead Flowers

Album: Sticky Fingers

Released:  April, 1971

Joshua Tree National Park is a site to behold.  The massive area in the remote interior of Southern California includes the convergence zone of 2 of the USA's 4 desert types:  The high-desert Mohave and the low-desert Colorado.  Driving the 60 or so miles from North to South, finds you descending 4000 feet in elevation from one to the other, and in the process witnessing a complete transition in plant life:  Joshua Trees and smaller yucca dominate the landscape in the Mohave; cholla cactus and ocotillo thrive in the Colorado.  

Joshua Tree NP also includes a countless number of rocky outcrops, which are all-encompassing as you weave your way through the upper section of the park.  The outcrops come in a variety shapes and size, inspiring nicknames over the centuries, including Skull Rock, Cap Rock, and Jumbo.  These rock heaps and the park in general, have attracted people from far and wide.  Interestingly enough, a large number of the visitors come from other countries, as for whatever reason Americans are not as enamored as foreigners are with this national treasure.  One of these foreigners was Keith Richards, who got the inside scoop from one of his best buddies, Gram Parsons, back in the early 70s. 

Both of their presence was felt by me this past Monday as I toured the region with the family.  At one point, looking at Skull Rock and thinking about Richards’ skull ring, I looked over at Nancy and stated “I believe I have my idea for this week’s Stepping Stone”.

-----------------    -----------------    -----------------    -----------------     ----------------- 

Gram Parsons, a fascinating American musician who I’ve written about on a handful of occasions, including a Gem of his own (GMVW # 66) connected with Keith Richards on a number of levels.  One, unfortunately, was heroin addiction, which would ultimately cut short his life at the age of 27.  Richards would eventually get over his own addiction (a classic line in his book, ‘Life’ has him stating “I believe it gave up on me”), but he was in the throes of it for about a decade, likely starting around the period when the Stones produced the songs for ‘Sticky Fingers’ in 1971.  And the song on the album that most reflects this aspect of his life at the time is this week’s Stepping Stone, Dead Flowers ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXlVpAPHdNs ).

Don’t let the upbeat sound of this song fool you:  Dead Flowers is heavy, possibly inspired by Richards’ darker memories at the time with Parsons.  The lyrics are a loose yet effective contrast between two worlds:  The highbrow society interests of an unnamed woman friend and the basement dwelling needle and spoon lifestyle of the songwriter himself.  This was what I was thinking about when I turned to Nancy in front of Skull Rock, and this was what had me thinking about my own world of contrast in the days leading up to our visit to Joshua Tree National Park.  The contrast of my world to a handful of others whose lives temporarily overlapped my own ended up rounding itself out even more over the ensuing hours, down in the remote – and unusually rainy during our drive through - Mexican border region of the Salton Sea.

-----------------    -----------------    -----------------    -----------------     ----------------- 

San Diego has something for everyone.  I’ve had the fortune of having visited now on four occasions, the most recent taking place over 10 days ending just this past Tuesday.  The first part of the trip was work related, attending the - at times overwhelming - ESRI Users Conference at the Convention Center downtown (17,000 people scurrying about from one session to another can do that to you).  The work aspect of my trip overlapped the play with the arrival of Peter, Charlotte, and Nancy on Wednesday afternoon.  They were able to join me at ESRI family nite that evening; Charlotte getting a good dose of GIS, a field she is showing interest in as she prepares for college in another year.  The next seven days played out wondrously: Sea lions on the rocks and in the caves in La Jolla; the orangutan against the glass in the San Diego Zoo along with the California condors perched high on their stand and many other amazing animals; the Spanish band in the secluded balcony in Balboa Park; a night on a yacht with Nancy’s longtime friend in the harbor; Old Town dining; Palm Springs; Coronado; Torrey Pines, and of course the aforementioned Joshua Tree NP.

Along with all this, however, were a few poignant moments of reflection after observing and connecting with several of the locals.  The first of them was a homeless lady. I stayed in Old Town just about the entire visit, and spent some time touring the streets in the evening and early morning. I kept on running into her, mostly before the family arrived.  She had a hard-times look about her; hunched, thin, unkempt, confused, and likely years older looking than her true age.  She was a reminder of my good fortune, and I made sure I connected with her, tried to understand her daily existence.  Beyond these encounters, however, I did not put much more thought into our brief moments of intersection …. that was until listening to the priest during Sunday Mass at Old Town’s Immaculate Conception. 

This past week’s gospel reading was the miracle of the 5 loaves and 2 Fishes.  I could have caught it anywhere, but something tells me I was meant to catch this particular sermon.  The padre, having only overseen the Old Town congregation for less than a month, was young, fiery, and intense.  We caught him at a good time and for the perfect reading.  After the gospel he paused for thought before beginning his homily.  He started by asking the congregation if any of us had ever dreamed of hamburgers.  After a mood-lightening moment relating to Wimpy of Popeye fame, he stated that there was a time in his life when he dreamed of hamburgers quite often.  The reason?  He was for many years a homeless person himself.  Wow.  Having pondered the thought of what this must be like over the days prior to this moment had this all connecting strongly with me.  The padre then continued by mentioning the homeless guy he talks with across the street from the church every day and another person who has stood on a corner in the same general area for years (he emphasized the word “years”), raising money for the poor.  He wrapped up his sermon in ways only a priest can, connecting back with the miracle of the loaves and fishes and the nourishment of faith.

The homeless lady.  The priest.  Worlds apart I was with both, but interconnected during my personal forays in a way that stuck, maybe even deeper than the work and play parts of the week.   Keith Richards explained contrast with another soul in song.  This tied in as well, giving me a template to work with.  There was one more unexpected piece of the puzzle, however:  The desert cowboy.

-----------------    -----------------    -----------------    -----------------     ----------------- 

Back to the Salton Sea > yes, it was actually raining there, this otherwise dry and desolate region. Heading back west on the only road (Rte. 78 to Julian) for many miles toward the mountain passes ahead we came across a rare event:  A series of flash floods cutting across the highway.  I’d never seen this and pointed it out to the kids.  One was still flowing over the road, a few feet deep.  We made it through and continued on another mile or so.  The next one though had left a 3 foot mound of mud in its wake.  This one was impossible to drive across.  There were at least 8 cars stopped dead in their tracks ahead of us, folks milling about and wondering what to do.  The mountain pass was just up ahead and tempting me:  Just another few miles to get out of the flats, the tumble weeds, cactus, and the ocotillo plants and into the conifer-dominated forest of the high slopes.  But now we were facing at least 3 hours of additional driving taking us first backward and then due South to the Mexican border (with no guarantee that we would not run into another flash flood).  I glanced to the right: A tow truck was stuck in the mud in an area just off the road as he had tried in vain to go around the mud.  A tow truck!  This was not a good sign.  Border patrol police were advising folks to turn around. 

Close to admitting defeat, I began talking with a gentleman, a local, driving with his wife:  Cowboy hat, cowboy boots; the whole nine yards.  He was yet another person a world apart from me, as there are not many more contrasting of landscapes and cultures in the country than Pepperell Massachusetts and the Salton Sea region.  He was willing to guide us along a dirt-road bypass, which cut off the main road about a mile back.  But his truck was a 4-wheel drive and ours a compact rental.  No guarantees.  We drove in about 100 yards, but it was soon clear neither of us were going farther when we encountered a large pooling of water.  We talked a bit.  I thanked him for trying to help us, and we turned around back up to the road.  Before heading backward, I gave the mud pile one last look.  2 cars were now completely engulfed in it; foolhardy drivers, but understandably desperate to make it through. 

Then I watched the desert cowboy cut just off the road back behind us and drive onto an adjacent dirt path down in the gully, flooring it as he went past us.  He made it through!  Yet it appeared he had a ways to go as we were told by the driver of a vehicle on the other side of the mud pile that there was another wash out up ahead.  We all watched the desert cowboy.  It was not until another 200 yards and several minutes later that we saw him bounce back up onto the highway.  He was on his way home.

Stubbornness set upon me.  I decided to go for it, try the same thing he did (with vehement verbal coaching from Peter and moral support from Nancy and Charlotte).  A few places, I got out of the car and cased out the situation.  It must have been similar to how the prairie travelers felt in their covered wagons 200 years earlier, crossing rivers and mud without bridges.  We got to the point where the 3-foot mud pile covered the road above, but now we were down in the gully.  Seeing that I was not to be denied, a border patrol officer called out and advised that I move through slowly, not follow the same fast-moving approach as the desert cowboy with the 4-wheel drive.  I agreed, tapping into my blizzard-driving sensibilities from years of driving back east. We plodded ahead… and made it! 

The hardest part was yet to come, though.  After passing the 2^nd washout in a relatively painless manner, we had to get back up on the road:  Straight ahead was a completely flooded area and there was no way of going through that.  I surveyed the immediate area, again on foot, and figured I had to ease onto the road at a gradual pace:  If I went straight over the hump we would bottom out.  There was no going back now.  I cleared out a few boulders in our way and then got back in the car.  A short prayer, and away we went.  Up, up, ….. and on!  Home free!  I’m guessing the crowd around the cars in my rearview mirror was clapping…..or maybe they were cursing.

-----------------    -----------------    -----------------    -----------------     ----------------- 

Dead Flowers was such a great song to see played in concert back in 1989.  On record, the song is about as close to singing in harmony as one will ever hear from the Glimmer Twins, and Jagger/Richards were somehow able to replicate their notes once more all those years later. Listening again to the song this week I was reminded of Kris Kristofferson in Sunday Morning Coming Down (“Well I woke up Sunday morning with no way to hold my head that didn’t hurt”):  Another song about contrasting worlds.  For Richards it was the contrast of the basement dweller and the socialite; for Kristofferson, the man with the Sunday hangover (he, himself) and the church goers. 

Yet are these worlds really all that contrasting?  In my case not so much.  I was able to relate to the folks I connected with last week in one way or another: The Homeless Lady, the Padre, and the Desert Cowboy.  We are all entwined: Human, living out our lives as best we can.  With a little effort, one can make connections with just about anybody.  The locals of Southern California were a strong reminder of this fact.

-          Pete

(30th in a series of) Stepping Stones "Alot for the Fey of Heart"

Song: I Am Waiting

Album: Aftermath

Released:  April, 1966

A few months back, Nancy, Peter and I watched ‘Rushmore’, a 1998 movie about the adventures of Max, an eccentric 15-year old, attending a private academy for teenagers.  Now when it comes to movies, I’m not all that easily pleased:  If I were a popular movie critic, I would have probably been knocked off by a producer’s hired gun at one time or another because I tend to put my thumbs down far more frequently than the Roger Ebert’s of the world.  But I liked this movie.  It was quirky, yet it captured some things very well, including the strong will of the main character.  More importantly it captured a unique spin on the innocence of youth which I am sure is hard to do for someone who is many years beyond that point in their lives (in this case, director Wes Anderson). 

‘Rushmore’ also has an incredible soundtrack, which frankly blindsided me; including the Kinks "Nothin' in the World Can Stop Me Worryin' 'Bout That Girl", the Faces "Ooh La La", and the live The Kids are Alright version of "A Quick One" (I couldn’t believe that one).  But what really caught my attention was a Rolling Stones song that I must admit I had not recalled hearing before.  The song was played in its entirety during a very well thought out and poignant sequence in the movie, which I will get to in a moment.  Clearly it was an early-years’ Stones song.  I loved it right off, and immediately thought it a perfect Stepping Stone.  I set the thought aside though, after determining that I had more investigation to do; not the least of which being that of tracking the title of the song and its place in Stones history. 

Last week I finally initiated that bit of research by first going to the ‘Rushmore’ web page and reviewing the soundtrack list to the movie. The song turned out to be I Am Waiting, which I soon discovered was on the 1966 ‘Aftermath’ album.  From there, I turned back to a trusted source during this now half-year process, that being a special 148 page edition of ‘Uncut’ about the Rolling Stones, published last year.  Among other articles, the publication includes re-reviews of each of the band’s 22 British-released studio albums.  The ‘Aftermath’ article, written by rock critic Rob Young, was a mixed review.  In it, Young points out that the Stones were still at that time releasing albums that included a few fillers, something the Beatles would never do. I’d have to agree with this key point, but having listened to the album now for a solid week, I can at the same time see that the Stones were beginning to distinguish themselves from the crowd in 1966 with well written and well performed hits, such as Paint it Black and Under My Thumb, as well as a few solid deep cuts such as Think and Goin’ Home. 

Young makes reference a few times in his article to this week’s Stepping Stone, I Am Waiting.  One point he makes is in his use of the term ‘feyness’ to describe it, while at the same time stating that the Stones would rarely if ever delve into this uniquely atmospheric sound again.  With this re-read of Young’s article under the belt, a few dots were beginning to connect in my mind.  From here I went on to You Tube, typed in “Movie Rushmore, I am Waiting”, and up popped the portion of the movie that unfolded during the playing of this song on the soundtrack ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCKKSeNWkJQ ).   Since the sequence was so well done both musically and visually, a wave of my own youthful flashbacks hit me.  Rob Young had gotten it precisely right:  This song indeed has feyness.  It’s a mid-60s sound that not too many bands’ I enjoy have achieved.  Leonard Cohen is an exception, having pulled it off quite often, most notably in his song So Long Marianne.  The Who actually did it a decade later on Who Are You, which can be heard in the bridge to the song.  And the Rolling Stones pull it off here.  It’s the sound of nostalgia.  It’s the sound of youthful innocence.  It’s an otherworldly sound.

-----------------   -----------------   -----------------   -----------------   -----------------  

A number of years ago, walking with Charlotte and Peter through my old Franklin neighborhood during a visit to my parents’ home, I challenged the kids to point anywhere and I would share a memory of my youth of that very spot with them.  And so they took me up on it, and over time we touched on a number of my younger-day experiences.  Below is an approximation of several of our many exchanges:

Charlotte:  “How about there, Dad” (pointing at an area just out front of a Dean College building)

Me: “In that corner, we used to make our way up on the roof to retrieve golf balls that we would hit onto the higher roof from the field beyond.  See how the higher roof is connected to the lower one by a steel rung ladder?  When we did this we had to keep a look out for the Dean Police, who did not want us up there.  On a few occasions they spotted us, and a mad scramble ensued.”

Peter: “Over there?”

Me: “That’s the Fitzpatrick home. I delivered there on my first paper route.  I used to keep a checklist of the dogs that accompanied me on that route, including my most frequent companions, my dog Nicky, and Phil’s dog Whiskers, who routinely met Nicky and I at a rendezvous location at the start of my route from his home 2 blocks away (with an impeccable sense of timing I might add).  One Thursday, collection day, Mrs. Fitzpatrick opened her door in response to my knocking, looked out on her lawn and saw 15 dogs behind me.  I recall her reaction being one of utter disbelief.  She insisted I stay put, ran back into her home, and took a photo of the group of us. No, I’ve never seen the photo.”

Peter (again):  “How about that barn back there?”

Me: “One summer, Bruce and I came up with the unusual idea of seeing how many barns we could sneak into and investigate.  There were so many large, unused old barns in the neighborhood, and it was often easy to crawl into a back open window.   It was scary but fascinating. That particular barn had a few old deer head mounts in a corner on the upper level.”

Charlotte: “Over there?”

Me:  “I remember when a significant part of downtown Franklin, that included Puritan Drug Store, went up in an inferno of flames.  My friends and I were hanging out on ‘The Wall’ when we heard the commotion from a distance.  I was on crutches at the time, having broken my leg a month earlier (another memorable story).  Everyone sprinted ahead of me, and so my hope that the crew meet at a common location when we got there quickly faded.  But good-friend Pete was a bit slower than the rest, so I was able to keep an eye on him, just catching a glance each time he went around the next bend (I was getting pretty good on crutches by then).  I remember going around that corner you pointed at early on in the sprint to downtown, seeing Pete, and just somehow knowing that I’d be keeping a bead on him for the remainder of the trek (which was the case).”

Peter and Charlotte:  “There?”

Me:  “That’s Mac’s yard.  I got pretty good at croquet there, but what I mostly remember is the kick-the-can nights.  Right there, a very large oak tree would cast a night shadow across the spotlighted field.  When you stayed completely in the shadow, you were practically invisible to the person who was ‘it’.  This was the surest way to make your way from the front to the back, which was a great area to launch an attack from.  Also, looking further back into the back field….the trees behind it had an amazing labyrinth of vines interconnecting them at the top.  Sitting up there on top of those vines was awesome:  A veritable super-sized crow’s nest for kids.”

Peter: “Up there?”

Me: “Those are the water towers.  You see the components of the towers broken up from top to bottom by connected steel drums?  We used to compete to see who could hit the highest drum in the chain with a rock or a chunk of asphalt.  The rocks would make a higher pitched tone the farther up you hit the water tower due to the level of water inside.  One day we were tossing rocks up there when we noticed, for lack of a better term, a local madman, shooting at us with a bee-bee-like pump gun from his 2^nd floor deck below the towers.  I was actually hit in the shoe.  We ran home to tell our parents.  I’m not sure how it all played out, but one of the results was us promising not to throw rocks at the towers ever again.  I guess the madman accomplished his goal.”

To this day Charlotte and Peter still take me up on that initial challenge, and occasionally I challenge myself.  Rarely am I stumped, and not just in the immediate neighborhood, but other parts of town.  For example, when taking the King Street route to Amy’s, I usually spot the former home of one R. Shores, who never once tipped me for the first handful of months during my Sunday driving paper route.  Early in this job, I did not have my license and so Dad would selflessly do the driving.  Picking up on the lack of a tip, Dad had me write notes attached to the newspaper stating things like “A penny saved is a penny earned”.  Before long, I was getting generous tips from Mr. Shores. 

And then there was the location on the Dean Field where we would play pickup baseball games:  Frequently short on fielders, Phil’s aforementioned dog, Whiskers, would occasionally fill in at shortstop, making amazing stabs of line drives with his mouth.  There were the train-track hiking discoveries with Dad: giant praying mantis, walking sticks, salamanders, lady slippers, and the like.  Dad again, hosting pickup football games, punting the ball and stating things to Mr. Bonolo like “That’s about as high as a kick as you would have seen from Harvey Shmeltzsticker”.  At Dean Junior College alone there were so many memories: There was the circus in the field; the Houdini character in the gym; the parachutist miscue, also in the field; the Mickey Mouse masked female streakers slicing a path between Phil and I as we cut across the campus one early evening; there was the fight with a bully (3 year’s older than me) not far from that same spot several years later.  Downtown also, so many memories: Vargin’s Market, Newberry’s, Kearney’s Drug Store, Jimmies Penny Candy Store, and the News Store.  Each location host to a flurry of thoughts: Wacky Packages, Slush Puppies, Fribbles, comic books, coin collection exchanges, lime ricki’s, creaky wooden floors, pinball, Fat Albert miniatures, sneaking into the loft areas and roof tops of vacant buildings, making friends with the employees, Big Butch, Joe Yoder.

And the list goes on.

-----------------   -----------------   -----------------   -----------------   -----------------  

This all brings me back to that poignant sequence in ‘Rushmore’ with the otherworldly sounds of I Am Waiting playing in the background (by the way, can anyone explain the scene at the beginning of the attached clip when the tree collapses with Bill Murray’s character watching?  I have a few theories but welcome input).  Feyness can probably be related to many things, but ‘Rushmore’ really captures the essence of it here.  The days of your youth can feel millions of light years away at times.  Life’s experiences can separate you from it, not simply in terms of time, but also in terms of state of mind.  There is no going back, unfortunately.

But this week, I got as close as I am likely ever going to get again.

-          Pete

(29th in a series of) Stepping Stones "Spotlight on Ronnie Wood: A Funfest in the Heat"

Song: She Was Hot

Album: Undercover

Released: November, 1983

Spotlight on: Ronnie Wood

Man it’s been hot out.  Back in February I rolled out Stepping Stone # 8, She’s So Cold, not really making the connection with the weather outside my den window.  I’m not so blind to the association this time around though.  This week’s entry, She Was Hot, is apropos of the current heat wave, and the counterpoint of She’s So Cold.  In fact, if the two songs came out together instead of three years apart, one of these songs would have been the perfect flip side on a common single.  But that’s beside the point.  In fact, it’s beside a lot of points, because there is much to write about this week; there is the topic of fate, there is the topic of fun, there is the topic of friendship, there is the topic of filling a niche, there is the topic of the Rolling Stones most frequently used calling card, and there is the topic of passion.  How to tie it all together? 

Why Ronnie Wood, of course.

---------------------   ---------------------  ---------------------   ---------------------   -----------------

The 3^rd stage of the Rolling Stones history began around 1976, when Mick Taylor suddenly quit the band just before they convened in the studio to work on the album ‘Black and Blue’.  And so, the role of 2^nd guitarist was once again up for grabs, the only position available in the band at any time until Bill Wyman laid down his bass guitar in 1993 after a 30 year run.  Due to the fact that Taylor’s announcement was so last minute, ‘Black and Blue’ turned out to be an audition album, featuring no less than 6 guitarists including Steve Marriott, Peter Frampton, and Wayne Perkins.  But it was Ronnie Wood who would make the cover, and it was Wood who would ultimately be offered to hop on board. 

Wood proved to be the perfect fit at the perfect time.  Mick Jagger, Charlie Watts, and particularly Keith Richards were starting to show the physical wear and tear of a Rock and Roll lifestyle in their faces, and the new guitarist just naturally looked the part, maybe even since birth.  Gone were the golden pretty boy years of first Brian Jones and then Mick Taylor, not to mention a younger Jagger.  The Stones were fittingly beginning to look like pirates.  Wood magnified the image.  It’s the first thing I noticed when I took it all in not soon after he signed up.  Ronnie Wood has always claimed that he was fated to be in the Rolling Stones, believing it would happen many years before it finally did:  The band simply had to age in the appropriate way to make it happen:  As Pete Townshend stated when he inducted the Stones into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame… “Don’t try to grow old gracefully, it wouldn’t suit you”.

Another reason Wood was a great fit was directly linked to Keith Richards, who had gone for far too long without a sparring partner.  Richards’ preferred style has always been to weave his guitar sound with another’s; so much so, that when he achieves this feat, it’s very difficult to tell who is playing what (this can be a little disconcerting for someone like me who likes to dissect the pieces of a song’s puzzle and give credit where credit is due).  For over a decade, Richards had most frequently achieved this weaving sound by overdubbing his own guitar playing in the studio.  The reason for this was that Brian Jones had pretty much given up the guitar a few years into his stint with the band (see Stepping Stone # 11), and Mick Taylor was at his best when playing more of a lead-guitar style (Stepping Stone # 19).  Richards was overdue for someone like Wood who was a willing participant in the style the founding guitarist so loved to perform. 

One aspect that Wood has been consistent in with his predecessors though is in his ability to carry on the general role as a 3^rd wheel in the Stones.  Both Jones and Taylor, 3^rd wheels themselves, were very bright and contributed substantially to the musical evolution of the band.  Wood did this in his own right.  The Stones already knew of his many talents as both a band member (including his stint with the Faces, who were just this year inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame) and as a solo artist who wrote his own music (such as songs on his classically titled ‘I’ve Got My Own Album To Do’).  I have seen him perform live with his own band, and he can command center stage as good as, if not better than, most.  One of my favorite moments in the Bob Dylan 30^th Anniversary (as a recording artist) video was when Wood led Booker T and the MGs through a rendition of Dylan’s Seven Days (covered in GMVW # 9). In general, Jagger and Richards have done a very good job of recruiting when the time came, finding cats who contribute without becoming overpowering:  The Glimmer Twins have always been able to find the George to complement their John and Paul. 

Aside from image and musical talent though, Wood brought a few other intangibles into the band with him.  It’s often been said that he mended many-a fences between band members, as the fissures started to seep in around the mid-80s.  Ronnie was everyone’s buddy, keeping close contact with both the increasingly bohemian Richards and the increasingly mainstream Jagger, who were slowly drifting apart.  These things inevitably happen, and so the new element may just have prolonged the band’s life all by his self.  He was also close with Wyman and Watts, not the most amiable of folks, during those difficult times.

Finally, Ronnie Wood brought amusement back to the band’s music, after a long period of first strife (Jones) and then heavy, serious musicianship (Taylor and everyone else).  When he joined, the Stones almost immediately started sounding fun again.  It’s the common denominator in all the albums that came after his arrival starting with a few songs off ‘Black and Blue’ (Hot Stuff, Cherry Oh Baby); and then ‘Some Girls’ (Far Away Eyes, the title track); followed by ‘Emotional Rescue (Where the Boys Go, She’s so Cold); and ‘Tattoo You’ (Neighbors, Start Me Up).  It’s their next album, however, 1983’s ‘Undercover’, which houses their most funfest of tracks, especially She Was Hot, this week’s Stepping Stone.

She Was Hot ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiksFF3862k ) has turned out to be one of the most surprisingly enjoyable tracks of my Rolling Stones adventure this year.  I had never really connected with it before, but it is pure fun, right up there with songs like Happy Jack, Bob Dylan’s 115 Dream, and of course, Rock Lobster.  As with last week’s Stepping Stone (Fool to Cry), repetition again works here:  The refrain, “She Was Hot”, feels hotter and hotter as the song goes on, and actually gets a bit hysterically out of control at the 1:54 mark of the attached url.  Some of the lyrics are classic, such as “If you were in my shoes, well you would be excused” and some of the closing lyrics to the 'story': "Back to the old bayou, Back to the tall bamboo, back to the human zoo".  I defy anyone who can print the lyrics, play the song loudly and sing it without at least cracking a smile.  The best part of the song is the last minute and a half, building up to a crescendo, including the great Charlie Watts drum role at the 4:17 mark.  And of course there are the weaving guitars of Mr. Richards and Mr. Wood at the song’s bridge.  Again, pure fun.

The topic of the song is without a doubt the most consistent of Rolling Stones calling cards.  The fact of the matter is that if you are going to make inroads with the Stones, there is one unavoidable piece of the puzzle: You are going to hear a lot of songs about woman.  This band has written more music about members of the opposite sex than any other that I know of.  I’d go as far as saying exponentially more.   In relation to woman, the Stones have penned love songs (Happy, Tops, Heaven); lust songs (Little T&A, Parachute Woman); put downs (She’s So Cold, Stupid Girl); praise (Loving Cup, Ruby Tuesday); defiance (Beast of Burden, Under My Thumb, If You Can’t Rock Me); pain (Miss You, Angie, Anybody Seen My Baby, Wild Horses); remorse (Coming Down Again, 100 Years Ago) and much more, including this week’s hot and heavy entry (the official MTV video with Anita Morris is something to see).

Mick Jagger is pretty convincing singing this song; the voice of experience I suppose.  The question then is can I relate to his insights; can I connect with his and Richards’ song other that at a musical level?  Well, I’ve never been one to kiss and tell, but just this once I’ll indulge. 

Was she hot?

……

…………

………………

…… Message Alert to the host of the “Gem Videos and Beyond” blog site:  The Blogspot Team has determined that the concluding contents of your most recent entry risks the loss of your status as a family friendly forum.  We have therefore taken liberties to remove that portion of your text. Do not challenge us in this way again, or we will be forced to remove your blog site from our pages..... but, ahhh... boy is that hot!     

-          Pete

(28th in a series of) Stepping Stones "My Fellow Aficionado's"

Song: Fool to Cry
Album: Black and Blue
Released: April, 1976

If you are going to enjoy a musician or band, it’s a bonus to have a fellow aficionado or two to bounce thoughts off of, as well as to be guaranteed someone will be joining you when the act makes its way through town.  I’ve been fortunate to have those connections for many of my favorite songsmiths.  Mac has been my most consistent compatriot over the years in all three phases of the process; discovery, concert attendance and digging deeper into the cuts.  He has also opened my eyes to a handful of songwriters I may have never gotten to know much about otherwise, including Jonathan Richman, Linda and Richard Thompson, and the Grateful Dead.

Though Mac has been top shelf as a music-aficionado comrade, he does not stand alone.  Through the years I’ve had cohorts for virtually every musician I’ve enjoyed listening to:  The Who and solo spinoffs (Kurt, Mac, Dave, Bec, Bouv); Neil Young (Nancy, Bouv, Jeff); Pink Floyd (Pete, Jen); Bob Dylan (Jeff, Mac); The Kinks (Fred); the Beatles and solo spinoffs (Pete); and R.E.M. (Pat) all come to mind.  Ok, I’ve been on my own with Leonard Cohen (though Nancy loved his show at the Wang Theatre several years back, much to her surprise).  But for the most part, I’ve been able to converse in truly appreciative ways with others on just about every musician of interest from Joe Jackson to the Cars, Iris Dement to Gram Parsons, the Band to Joni Mitchell, and Elvis Costello to the Clash.

There was one band, however, that for far too long I never had a fellow enthusiast to connect with:  The Rolling Stones.  A few loose ties had cropped up off and on, but not many.  There was that guy in North Adams, Craig, who I wrote briefly about in Stepping Stone # 1.  There was another North Adams student, Romeo…..good friend of Bouv’s: Huge Stones fan.  He even looked like Mick Jagger.  Then there’s my colleague at USGS, the son of a preacher man, who I wrote about in SS # 2.  Other than those examples, though, I’d been alone in my deeper appreciation.  Closer friends had attended shows with me, yet there’s a big difference between simply getting your ya-ya’s out and basking in the moment.  Everyone can appreciate this sentiment with examples of their own I’m sure: Cases where you are heavy into something and others are simply curious.

Yes, I was running solitary in the Rolling Stones department for some time.  And then, in the early 90s, Amy introduced the family to Paul…. a fellow Stones aficionado, who ultimately landed in our family no less.  I knew pretty early on this interest of his was no fluke.  No smoke and mirrors here.  Brother-in-law Paul knew his stuff.  It took a bit of grilling to tease the most interesting tidbits out.  Most big brothers might circle the wagons to see what lurked there in the heart when it came to an interest by someone in their little sister.  Not me in this case, at least not in a traditional sense.  Once I knew Paul was waving that Glimmer Twins banner, I quizzed him on all things Stones while trying to black out the image of the Richard Nixon books on his bookshelf:  Favorite song?; favorite album?; favorite band member?; song meanings?; who did he think was leader of the band at certain stages of their career and why?; was he interested in emulating the relationship between Keith Richards and Anita Pallenberg? (hopefully not).  That kind of stuff.  He passed with flying colors….on most accounts.

You know someone is a Stones fan when he gets pumped about the band’s performance in their 1968 Rock and Roll Circus documentary:  The Rolling Stones themselves refused to release this show for decades, knowing they were clearly outclassed by their guests, the Who.  You know someone is a Stones fan when he has all of their studio albums and most of their compilations.  You know someone is a Stones fan when he names one of his dog’s “Angie” and another “Hannah” (after the gal in Memory Motel), has a photo of the band on his bathroom wall (in homage to the cover of ‘Beggars Banquet’?), and attends all 3 venue sizes of the their 2002 ‘Licks’ tour, including stadium (Gillette), arena (Boston Garden) and theatre (Orpheum > The Stones played the deepest of cuts at the Orpheum:  I’m forever envious).  You know someone is a Stones fan when his coffee table is littered with a virtual band bibliography. 

You really know someone is a Stones fan when he purchases Ronnie Wood’s limited edition vinyl boxed set “I Want You To Hear This”.

And with Paul, Amy came along for the ride as well:  A veritable 2 for 1 so to speak.  I could see it in Amz eyes not long into their relationship.  She was hooked, not just to Paul, but to the band he loved.  And so, concert attendance became a big event for all of us, as did listening to the Stones at parties, at one of our homes, or on a joy ride.  Amy’s interest was not superficial by any means.  She became a fast learner, asking the deeper questions and offering some intriguing insights of her own.  It was all great, mostly because it was unexpected.  But then again, I should have known better….. Amy, like me, has the potential for occasional bouts with late-bloomer syndrome.  I mean this in a good way, as it’s rare to open the mind up to something new as life weaves its way beyond your formative days.

Ok, so why Fool to Cry for this week’s Stepping Stone?  Well, way back during the original Gem Videos, I rolled out two Rolling Stones songs.  The first was Waiting on a Friend (GMVW # 41):  Turns out I had hit on a common gem of a song with Paul that I could not recall being the case when I grilled him years earlier.  The second, Memory Motel (GMVW # 83) I knew for sure would connect with both Amy and Paul.  However, since I had already used it as a Gem I had to dig a bit deeper.  I got to thinking about Rolling Stones ballads, seeing as Angie, Waiting on a Friend, and Memory Motel, favorites of the Citarell’s, are all on the slow, ballad-like side of the scale for this band. 

I’m not big on several of the Stones most popular ballads, Beast of Burden, and Wild Horses, but I do thoroughly enjoy most of the others, particularly Memory Motel.  And the album that Memory Motel is on, ‘Black and Blue’ happens to have another great ballad (rare for this band), that being Fool to Cry ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Teo0LYxjxvI ).  I’ve had this one lined up for about a month now, and coincidently it happens to be one of a handful of songs the Stones jammed together on just a few weeks back in preparation for who-knows-what.  I’ve never seen them play it live.  It would be something.  Regardless, it reaffirmed the selection for me.

And so, Fool to Cry is my offering to my fellow Stones aficionados in the family, lovers of the balladeer side of the band (along with much else).  Ballads are hard to pull off in Rock and Roll.  There has to be subtle variety in the song, as most ballads sound drudgingly repetitive.  But the Stones make this ballad work:  There are the 3 stages of the song; daughter, lover, friend, all giving advice to the protagonist, the broken man.  There’s the guitar accentuating the very first “oooo, Daddy you’re a fool to cry” (44 second mark of the url link).  There’s Charlie Watt’s slow drum role in the 3^rd stage of the song (3:10 mark).  There are Mick Jagger’s professional adjustments throughout, keeping the song fresh almost on his own.  And fascinatingly enough, the repetition of “Daddy you’re a fool to cry” works wonders.  It gets more meaningful as the song goes on.  Perhaps there’s something to the Buddhist “om” mantra after all.

Well, it’s time to retire for the day.  I’ve gotta get up early tomorrow; take a stroll through the woods and ponder some more on Paul’s most recent observation on the Rolling Stones, that being that Keith Richards is Mick Jagger’s bitch.  I’ve thought long and hard on that one.  I had always thought it was the other way around.  But there’s always room for reevaluation.

Especially when mulling over the insights of a fellow aficionado.

-          Pete