Album: Harvest
Released: February, 1972
Personal biases can be hard to overcome. We all tend to gravitate to what’s
familiar. Some never sway from their
original set of beliefs. They stick with
these convictions all the way to the grave.
Hopefully, however, your eyes can at some point be opened to the less
familiar, and then, what was once thought of as inferior is now seen in a
different light.
My bias to the electric, full bodied, rock n’ roll band sound runs
deep. I’m an amplified guy at the
core. My first mind-altering musical
moments were the plugged-in Beatles.
From there it was a steady diet of high-decibel music on the turntable,
including the Stones, the Kinks, and Pink Floyd. My attendance at concerts in the early going
was contingent on this electric sound as well, from Elvis Costello and Joe
Jackson to Rush and Tom Petty. Mixed in
throughout the early goings was the Who; seemingly the point of no return. In the 70s and 80s, the radio stations I
listened to regularly made sure guys like me kept allegiances strong with our
foundations. No dance beat, and no solo
acoustic mellow strumming either. It was
all about rock bands; the louder the better.
I’ve never lacked for valid reasoning behind why I like this style of
rock n’ roll so much. For one thing, I
have always believed (to this day) that creativity tends to get more
interesting and more complex and more original when there’s a band playing,
preferably with long-standing members.
Storylines are better with bands that have a long history together. The sense that anyone, and not just the very
gifted, could be part of something amazing if they happen to be in the right
place at the right time, and then stick with it through the tough times, is
appealing to me. I like the notion of a genius,
but what’s even more intriguing is the thought that a unique amalgamation of
characters can make something big happen, and not only that, they can raise the
bar beyond what the genius types could do on their own. I like the idea that something special can
grow over time between band members, and that in the right circumstances it can
be transformative…. to them and their audience.
More specifically to that electric, full bodied, rock n’ roll band sound,
there’s the jamming, the improvisation, the rapid-fire sense of timing - the
bass playing off the drums playing off the lead guitar - that fascinates
me. There’s interplay and what I
consider amazing, unique moments when it all meshes. Pete Townshend, a genius,
wrote great songs on his own, played all the instruments and brought the demos
to the band to record as the Who. The
demos were fantastic; to the degree that critics have commented that all Keith
Moon, Roger Daltrey, and John Entwistle had to do was emulate what they heard. Au contraire!
The Who had to Who-ify those demos…. and they did. No one else could do this. No other combination of personalities and
talents. Reading his memoir, “Who I Am”,
even Townshend appears to under-appreciate the band’s role in the creative
process. But I don’t. There are numerous stories on how things
evolved for the Who in the studio and on stage when the four of them played off
each other. I had hoped Townshend would
have discussed this more in his book. Then
there are the Stones. I believe it was studio
engineer Glyn Johns who once said that they would sit around for hours on end
and sound like shit, but then there would suddenly be a moment where Keith
would nod at Charlie, and then Bill would stand up, and they transformed into
the Rolling Stones right in front of him.
I love these stories.
That full bodied sound was pretty much it for me all through the
80s. With this bias, I for the most part
stayed clear of the more toned down, acoustic shows and albums. There were a few exceptions, including a
great Simon and Garfunkel show in ’86 (see GMVW # 36). But even at that event, my favorite song was
a souped-up version of Late in the
Evening. Early waves of MTVs “Unplugged”
passed me by. Why would these musicians
want to unplug and adapt such great music?
I could have gone on forever like this and probably would have, seeing
as the music that first touched me is so darn good. I would have never known any better. Thank goodness,
however, that there were those in my circles, whom I had much respect for, observing
my musical interests at the time. I’d
like to believe they saw an apperception for quality, and therefore potential,
in a manner that I was worth investing their time to round out my musical
knowledge.
One of them was good friend, Jeff Stause, who has been broadening my
musical horizons for a good 20 plus years now.
There’s so much to be thankful for with Jeff. I would have never attended those relatively lower-key,
smaller stage shows by the likes of Richie Havens, Arlo Guthrie, Richard
Thompson, Sean Colvin, Rick Danko, the Nields, and many others (Jonathan
Richman is on this list too, but I’ll give credit to Mac and Fred for that
link). I may have never enjoyed the
music of Townes Van Zandt, Graham Parsons, Iris Dement, or Emmylou Harris. These musicians
were/are storytellers. Their show
sometimes took patience to enjoy, but at virtually every event, there would be
a gradual buildup. If you listened closely,
and took it all in, it was as intense as any big-time rock n’ roll event could
be.
When I went to Tanglewood in western Massachusetts to see a solo Neil
Young acoustic set with Jeff in June of 1992, I was not expecting much. I’d
already seen Neil in several of his more rocking permutations, so this
stripped-down sound was sure to be anticlimactic. As it turned out, it was the beginning of
this transformation for me. It was an
event that helped me out of my insular world of amplified rock-music appreciation. Quality is quality, no matter the genre. That acoustic set in Lenox Massachusetts was
a big step for me in realizing this.
Here’s the set list of Neil’s solo performance that evening:
Long May You Run
Unknown Legend
Comes a Time
Dance, Dance, Dance
Love Is a Rose
From Hank to Hendrix
The Needle and the Damage Done
Tonight's the Night
Hitchhiker (this one is hard to believe)
Old Man
This Note's for You
Like a Hurricane
Old King
Such a Woman
Heart of Gold
Don't Let It Bring You Down
Sugar Mountain
After the Gold Rush
As done last week, here’s a bit of breakdown of my interpretation of
the lyrics to Harvest as I see them:
Did I see you down in a young girl's
town
With your mother in so much pain?
I was almost there at the top of the stairs
With her screamin' in the rain
With your mother in so much pain?
I was almost there at the top of the stairs
With her screamin' in the rain
Did she wake you up to tell you that
It was only a change of plan?
Dream up, dream up, let me fill your cup
With the promise of a man
It was only a change of plan?
Dream up, dream up, let me fill your cup
With the promise of a man
Ø
I believe we have here a mother who has taken a sudden turn for the worse
in her battle with something. Still,
this woman has an amazing strength in both faith and spirit to be philosophical
at such a fatal moment. The singer is
not quite connected with the daughter just yet (“almost there at the top of the
stairs”) at this critical time in her life, but wishes he was
Did I see you walking with the boys
Though it was not hand in hand?
And was some black face in a lonely place
When you could understand?
Though it was not hand in hand?
And was some black face in a lonely place
When you could understand?
Did she wake you up to tell you that
It was only a change of plan?
Dream up, dream up, let me fill your cup
With the promise of a man
It was only a change of plan?
Dream up, dream up, let me fill your cup
With the promise of a man
Ø
This may be a reference to mourning:
A daughter in black, struggling to get beyond her loss, not able to
connect with her children. The singer
realizes she’s on her own now as a daughter and mother, wishing to make things
better.
Will I see you give more than I can
take?
Will I only harvest some?
As the days fly past will we lose our grasp
Or fuse it in the sun?
Will I only harvest some?
As the days fly past will we lose our grasp
Or fuse it in the sun?
Did she wake you up to tell you that
It was only a change of plan?
Dream up, dream up, let me fill your cup
With the promise of a man
It was only a change of plan?
Dream up, dream up, let me fill your cup
With the promise of a man
Dream up, dream up, let me fill your
cup
With the promise of a man
With the promise of a man
Ø
Well, this last stanza is self-explanatory I would think. Still, the reference to a harvest is telling:
The daughter, it would seem, has gained
her mother’s strengths in the process of losing her, likely fueled by those words of wisdom that are repeated in each stanza.
‘Harvest’ was Neil Young’s greatest selling album, going
multi-platinum. I wonder when it is musicians
know they have a “classic” album in the works…. take Van Morrison’s ‘Astral
Weeks’ for example or the Rolling Stones ‘Exile on Main Street’. Well, that’s a story for another time. For now, I’d like to kick back and enjoy an
acoustic highlight ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-Oz-M0UBN0
), while feeling a sense of gratitude for friends like Jeff, who opened my eyes
to some new experiences.
-
Pete